Wrong advice: do not express pimples
You have to read so many nonsense about acne treatment, which is usually often babbled by non-thinkers often. But again and again this is to be read: "Just do not express pimples, fingers away, otherwise everything will get worse"!
But already an old dogma says: "Ubi pus, ibi evacua!", Which means: "Where there is pus, empty it there!"
So if you have visible pus on the skin, you should empty and express it. After a certain degree of maturation, pus must drain away. Because he will either way!
What would happen if you do not?
The pimple would rise by itself (as "beautiful" to look!) And drain on non-infected skin, the pus, - absolutely the worst!
Only in certain cases you can "push back" pimples with appropriate substances, it always depends on the degree of acne, the shape and the degree of ripeness of the pimples!
Of course, the expression under hygienic conditions must be done (disinfect, wrap fingers with clean tissue, post-disinfect, after-care) and scars remain only when you squeezed on an immature pimple, that hurt your fingers or because the degree of inflammation destroyed deeper skin layers become, which, however, with appropriate expressions no influence!
The regular acne toilet is therefore an important part of the treatment of acne and contributes significantly to improving the quality of life of acne plagues, because you can overpower expressed pimples and remaining Pickelmale much better (of course aknegerecht) and antibacterial cover.
Already clear that a profession of "beauticians" might have an interest in such a general false statement. But who has time and money to go there for every acne toilet? And who wants that? Is that feasible? How long would it take to test each of your pre- or post-treatment products for non-comedogenic ingredients?
